Mar
9

Work comp’s moving to electronic payments…

When was the last time you wrote a check?

When was the last time you manually deposited a paycheck?

When was the last time you bought stamps?

The world is switching to electronic payments – they are wholly secure, incredibly cheap, and super efficient. Yet some work comp payers are still writing checks and mailing them to providers, while others that have begun the journey are still mailing thousands of checks and EOBs every week.

Given work comp’s top challenges – declining premiums and fewer dollars and fewer resources for administration, and the ease of adopting e-payments – makes zero sense.

Paying providers is one of those “have to get it right” things that suck up resources and staff time. The challenges are many –

  • ensuring the provider’s banking info is exactly right
  • fraud prevention
  • postal challenges
  • tying the EOB to the payment
  • producing and delivering 1099s
  • answering provider questions about payments

In group health and governmental programs, electronic payments are fast becoming mandatory.

Aetna, United Healthcare and other giant payers are mandating electronic payments for their providers…as work comp accounts for less than 1% of total US healthcare payments, payers that don’t/can’t pay electronically  will find their costs going up and provider relations suffering.

Join me next Friday March 18 for a webinar on electronic payments and work comp – free registration is here; California CLE and claims credits are available. Hosted by WorkCompCentral, Change Healthcare’s Bill Barbato and I will dive into:

  • how to evaluate the impact of e-payments on costs and margins,
  • what you should expect from your e-payment vendor;
  • how e-payments get implemented;
  • why providers want e-payments, and
  • how paying providers can generate revenue.

Change Healthcare – formerly Emdeon – is the industry leader in electronic payments…

What does this mean for you?

With declining premiums adding pressure to admin expenses, electronic payments are a must-do.

Change is an HSA consulting client.

 


Mar
4

The jobs boom

Gas prices are up, there are concerns about inflation, and some shortages continue – that’s the bad news.

The good news is the hiring boom that’s been going on for over a year shows no signs of abating, AND wage increases seem to have moderated a bit – which may be good news on the inflation front.

As a result, unemployment is down to 3.8% – a great number by any standard.

From the New York Times:

Job openings are near a record high. Layoffs are at a new low. And hiring has remained strong in the ebb and flow of successive waves of the pandemic — employers have added at least 400,000 jobs every month since May, the longest such streak on record. [emphasis added]

The economy is moving in the right direction; things are looking solid for a robust 2022 indeed.

What does this mean for you?

More workers = more health insurance and workers’ comp premium dollars.


Mar
1

Stuff you should know

When Physician Management Companies took over anesthesia practices, the units (amount of services) and prices went up dramatically (when compared to other practices).

As in 16.5% and 18.7% respectively.

No surprise, prices went up even more – as in 26% – if the PMCs were owned by private equity companies.

The fine folks at WorkCompCentral published the news that OptumRx settled with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts over the Commonwealth’s claim that OptumRx failed to follow workers’ compensation prescription drug pricing procedures. OptumRx agreed to pay the state $5.8 million. The settlement is here.

I’m trying to get more detail on this as the Commonwealth’s press release is a bit confusing.  You’ll know if/when we get more details.

Finally, the conspiracy theory that somehow COVID came from a lab has been put to rest – at least for those of us who believe in science. Somehow I doubt the tin foil hat crowd will accept the news that the virus originated in the Wuhan market.

Where COVID originated 

From Michael Worobey, a co-author on both studies and an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona via Medscape “When you look at all the evidence together, it’s an extraordinarily clear picture that the pandemic started at the Wuhan market…”

More details on the two studies:

In one study, researchers used spatial analysis to show that the earliest COVID-19 cases, which were diagnosed in December 2019, were linked to the market. Researchers also found that environmental samples that tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus were associated with animal vendors.

In another study, researchers found that two major viral lineages of the coronavirus resulted from at least two events when the virus spread from animals into humans. The first transmission most likely happened in late November or early December 2019, they wrote, and the other likely happened a few weeks later.

There’s an excellent synopsis of the research and methodologies here. If you want to weigh in, please review the article at the link first.

What does this mean for you?

For-profit healthcare can be very problematic, and science always wins.

We are all shocked and heartsick over Putin’s War on Ukraine – if you want to help Ukraine and Ukrainians, please consider a contribution to Care. Care is a very reputable and highly effective NGO with a rich history of successfully mitigating disasters and helping people.


Feb
28

My apologies for the previous attempt to post this…a picture in the post somehow blocked the view of the body of the post.

What’s the deal with long-term COVID?

Why are facility costs increasing and where?

How will labor market disruptions affect work comp?

These and other questions will be addressed in Boston March 16 and 17 at WCRI’s Issues and Research Conference. I caught up with WCRI CEO John Ruser and Communications Director Andrew Kenneally to get the scoop.

remember these days…?

[Register here…don’t put it off as this often sells out]

COVID

26 months into the COVID era we know a lot more about the short-term health impacts of COVID (and associated medical costs and duration) but we’re only starting to understand how COVID infections affect us – and may impact work comp – over the long term. Dr Ruser noted the:

“majority of COVID claims are short duration and most don’t have medical expense, things that are going to surprise us may well be long covid associated (issues)…(we are) doing studies on covid claims and persistence in terms of services provided that WC payers are covering”

Denise Algire, Dan Allen, and Craig Ross DO are the panelists for a discussion of the workplace “after” COVID; mandates, return to worksites, and medical care are all on the docket. [I’m not sure there will ever be an “after” COVID; more likely we’re entering a “COVID era.”]

Facility costs

WCRI’s members have identified facility costs (inpatient and outpatient hospital and ambulatory surgery facility) as a key concern; one of the biggest drivers is provider consolidation.  Dr Bogdan Savych and Dr Sebastian Negrusa will discuss their research into the effect of provider consolidation on workers’ comp medical payments; Dr Ruser:

WCRI’s stakeholders raised this as a top issue…there will be some eyebrows raised as there hasn’t been research on the impact of vertical and horizontal integration’s effect on workers comp. We will discuss the implications for costs from both vertical integration and the acquisition of Primary care practices by larger health systems.

More on this issue here here and here.

Employment

The estimable Dr Bob Hartwig will educate and engage as only he can. Somehow Dr Hartwig manages to make the densest of topics relevant and entertaining. With employment a key driver of all things workers’ comp;

“disruptions in labor markets are going to have lasting impacts on the way we work and on workers’ comp claims. Bob Hartwig is coming to talk about these disruptions and their implications for workers’ comp”

What does this mean for you?
All in all, a festival of facts, a cornucopia of content,  await us in Boston…along with a most-needed opportunity to see old friends and, dare I say…shake hands?


Feb
25

What’s the deal with long-term COVID?

Why are facility costs increasing and where?

How will labor market disruptions affect work comp?

These and other questions will be addressed in Boston March 16 and 17 at WCRI’s Issues and Research Conference. I caught up with WCRI CEO John Ruser and Communications Director Andrew Kenneally to get the scoop.

remember these days…?_DSC2004.jpg

[Register here…don’t put it off as this often sells out]

COVID

26 months into the COVID era we know a lot more about the short-term health impacts of COVID (and associated medical costs and duration) but we’re only starting to understand how COVID infections affect us – and may impact work comp – over the long term. Dr Ruser noted the:

“majority of COVID claims are short duration and most don’t have medical expense, things that are going to surprise us may well be long covid associated (issues)…(we are) doing studies on covid claims and persistence in terms of services provided that WC payers are covering”

Denise Algire, Dan Allen, and Craig Ross DO are the panelists for a discussion of the workplace “after” COVID; mandates, return to worksites, and medical care are all on the docket. [I’m not sure there will ever be an “after” COVID; more likely we’re entering a “COVID era.”]

Facility costs

WCRI’s members have identified facility costs (inpatient and outpatient hospital and ambulatory surgery facility) as a key concern; one of the biggest drivers is provider consolidation.  Dr Bogdan Savych and Dr Sebastian Negrusa will discuss their research into the effect of provider consolidation on workers’ comp medical payments; Dr Ruser:

WCRI’s stakeholders raised this as a top issue…there will be some eyebrows raised as there hasn’t been research on the impact of vertical and horizontal integration’s effect on workers comp. We will discuss the implications for costs from both vertical integration and the acquisition of Primary care practices by larger health systems.

More on this issue here here and here.

Employment

The estimable Dr Bob Hartwig will educate and engage as only he can. Somehow Dr Hartwig manages to make the densest of topics relevant and entertaining. With employment a key driver of all things workers’ comp;

“disruptions in labor markets are going to have lasting impacts on the way we work and on workers’ comp claims. Bob Hartwig is coming to talk about these disruptions and their implications for workers’ comp”

What does this mean for you?
All in all, a festival of facts, a cornucopia of content,  await us in Boston…along with a most-needed opportunity to see old friends and, dare I say…shake hands?


Feb
23

Cash cows, Corporate cut-backs and Corporate-speak

Six weeks ago I predicted:

TPAs will add more business, mostly from carriers.
As work comp continues to shrink, insurers will ramp up efforts to shed assets and expenses to reduce their cost structure. By outsourcing claims, carriers are trading the high fixed costs of a claims infrastructure for the variable cost of a per-claim admin fee.
The smarter carriers will negotiate hard so they don’t get screwed by medical management and other non-fixed fees…but many carriers aren’t that smart…

and…Insurers will reduce staff, particularly in claims.

Here’s an update.

There’s been lots of rumors out there about AIG’s plans to get out of the claims business and associated layoffs, so I reached out to AIG. (full conversation below)

Net is I’m hearing there have been layoffs in IT (never a strong suit at AIG), work comp claims, and medical management services.  Likely other areas as well.

Focusing on work comp/medical management, this is a) wholly predictable and b) likely to happen at other insurers.

The reasons are straightforward:

  • work comp is a declining industry
    • in 4 years there will be 10% fewer claims than there are today
  • work comp is a classic cash cow; mature, throwing off lots of cash and stagnant

The implications are clear – why would an insurance exec invest in a business that is declining, way behind in technology investment, has an aging workforce and can’t attract young talent?

Especially when it can outsource claims to a TPA, thereby:

  • reducing fixed costs and unallocated loss adjustment expense (ULAE)
  • eliminating the need to invest in IT upgrades for claims and medical management systems
  • getting rid of an older and expensive workforce and the attendant costs for real estate, IT support, telecom, benefits and on and on.

Congratulations to Gallagher Bassett, which appears to have landed a lot more work. This will help GB immensely as it will gain revenue it can use to make those IT investments, hire and train staff, and upgrade operations.

Finally, corporate-speak.

Why AIG would not answer questions clearly and cogently is beyond me. Without those answers, one has to look to message boards and contacts at the company and those recently departed, sources that have – by definition – more narrow perspectives influenced and affected by the impact of AIG’s actions and non-actions.

That doesn’t mean those perspectives aren’t valid – not at all. It does mean that you, dear reader, don’t have the full picture as to what is happening at AIG and why.

What does this mean for you?

If AIG work comp is a customer, pay very close attention.

Email conversation:

here’s what I asked AIG

I’m working on a blog post re carriers using TPAs for workers’ comp claims.  I understand AIG is in the process of outsourcing WC claims to Gallagher Bassett; evidently there was an internal communication to employees in December addressing this.

My questions:

        1. AIG has long used TPAs for claims handling, but also handled claims internally. Is AIG in the process of outsourcing all/most WC claims that were previously handled internally?
        2. If so, what is driving this decision?
        3. Sources indicate the timing is Q2 2022; is this accurate?
        4. Indications are AIG is also reducing the role of HDI; can you speak to that?

Here’s AIG’s response:

AIG has entered a strategic partnership with Gallagher Bassett for the shared management of our “bundled” workers’ compensation claims in the U.S. This partnership will combine AIG’s in-house claims expertise and customer service with Gallagher Bassett’s industry-leading infrastructure, analytics and technology. AIG will continue to handle major loss and specialty claims and medical management, while also providing technical and strategic guidance for all claim management and resolution.

And here’s my follow-up

So, thanks for the statement.
Is AIG staff handling claims?
Is AIG doing all the Managed care work but using GB’s IT for claims?
My understanding from AIG staff is that GB will handle claims, so I’m a bit confused.
AIG’s response was classic corporate-speak and – as you can see – didn’t answer my questions. AIG also didn’t respond to my follow-up.

Feb
16

Quick hits…

I’ve done a few podcasts recently, and find them to be a lot of fun. Yvonne and Rafael hosted me in a kick off the second season of their Deconstructing Comp pod…we dove into opioids, humility, making things real, testifying before Congress, physician dispensing, blogging and grandkids.

CWCI’s annual meeting is DIFFERENT this year.

The fine folks at CWCI recognize that many members and other usual attendees are still under travel restrictions and may have personal and/or public health concerns. To accommodate as many people as possible, this year there will be both live (3/8) and virtual (3/10) conferences.  Register for both the live and virtual meetings here:  https://www.cwci.org/conferences.html; the virtual meeting will combine recordings of the live sessions with a live Q&A.

There’s a lot on the agenda related to legislative targets including access to care/MPNs, presumptions, med/legal & QMEs as well as the usual claims monitoring report (COVID/Non-COVID claim dynamics, utilization, pharmacy).

Michael Marks, a most insightful attorney will tie together the theme (“Are We There Yet”) with a comparison of the original grand bargain to our current state.

Not to be outdone, NCCI’s out with their latest economic briefing; highlights include:

  • Unemployment rates at or below 4% in December and January indicate that the US economy is nearing full employment.
  • Job losses are now concentrated in just two major sectors: Leisure and Hospitality, and Education and Health Services. (With family members in healthcare, I know first hand why so many are quitting)
  • January’s employment numbers showed no effects of the Omicron surge…deferred jobs hit in February is unlikely.

The Conference Board forecast that the US economy will grow by 2.6 percent (year-over-year) in 2022. I’m no economist (yippee!) but I’m betting we’ll see significantly higher growth – which will positively effect employment, wages, and thus workers’ comp and group health premium growth.

What does this mean for you?

Things are getting better. 


Feb
3

Stuff you should know

In my ongoing effort to help you, dear reader, stay informed and on top of important stuff, I have this email folder titled “Blog Fodder” wherein I park news items worthy of your attention.

Here’s the fodder filling the folder these days…

Cash assistance = potentially smarter kids

A really interesting – and important – study found that babies of mothers that had received cash assistance had increased brain activity when compared to mom’s without cash assistance. From the study…

The resultant brain activity patterns have been shown to be associated with the development of subsequent cognitive skills.

WCRI’s Annual confab will include a session on Drug Formularies and the impact thereof. Register for the meeting here.

The good folks at Ametros collaborated on a study assessing CMS’ denial of payments for work comp-related claims. Evidently some folks thought this didn’t happen…turns out it does. Extrapolating from a random sample, researchers estimate CMS denied 36 thousand claims annually from 2018 to 2020.

Hear all about it in their February 15 webinar; register here.  And download the report here.

COVID good news.

From the NYT, the CDC released a study showing:

[boosters] are 90 percent effective against hospitalization with the [Omicron] variant, the agency reported. Booster shots also reduced the likelihood of a visit to an emergency department or urgent care clinic. The extra doses were most effective against infection and death among Americans aged 50 and older…

How effective for us oldsters?

VERY..unvaccinated Americans between 50 and 64 were 44 times more likely to end up in the hospital with Covid than those in the age group who were vaccinated and received a booster shot.

And really good news; from Charles Gaba, the uninsured rate for U.S. population was 8.9% for the third quarter of 2021 (July – September 2021), down from 10.3% for the last quarter of 2020 – corresponding to roughly 4.6 million more people with coverage over that time period.


Feb
2

Acquisitions and takeaways therefrom, Part 2

Yesterday we dove into the Paradigm-HomeCare Connect transaction and opined on the whats and whys. Today the TRISTAR-Risico deal is up for discussion.

Background

TRISTAR is a mid-tier national TPA, known for its work with employers and public entities. TRISTAR focused on workers’ comp for most of the time I’ve known the company, although of late it has grown its non-work comp services; Auto and liability now account for almost 30% of TRISTAR’s business.

Q&A

I caught up with President Tom Veale via email, here’s our Q&A…

  1. MCM – there’s a lot of overlap in the companies’ target industries of ag and public entities; is TRISTAR looking to strengthen its presence in these markets?
    Tom – We like both industries and have a significant presence in both, especially in the west.
  2. MCM – I noted the emphasis on geography; how does adding more business in California’s Central Valley tie into TRISTAR’s strategy?
    Tom – The central valley is the breadbasket of America.  We love doing business there.  The Ross & Castillo firm gave us a great base to build from sixteen years ago.
  3. MCM – Re managed care offerings, what and how does RISICO managed care services add to TRISTAR’s capabilities?
    Tom – Risico has a great team of case management and bill review professionals that will strengthen our team in California.  They also have a team of network developers and managers who will significantly expand our capabilities.  Total Managed Care will be integrated into TRISTAR Managed Care.
  4. MCM – You noted the cultural fit.  Can you provide more color around that?
    Tom – Bill and Steve built a company that operates like an extended family in many ways.  They take care of each other and in doing so, take care of their clients injured workers.  We strive to do the same at TRISTAR.  Being privately held, both of us can make the long-term investments required in our industry today – not having to worry about quarterly earnings, borrowing covenants and the like.

We then got into a discussion of what’s happening with TPAs, which look to me to be one of the only sectors of the work comp industry that is growing.

Tom’s views on what’s happening with TPAs and why…

  • I think WC TPAs are consolidating.
  • The number of claims keeps dropping for most employers – and has for twenty years. Improved safety practices and automation are the two big culprits. A while ago you talked about the industry shrinking – I think it was 2 to 3% a year. We have seen that as our average client with stable operations has less new and less open claims today than five years ago.
  • The increasing cost of operating a TPA is becoming painful for many. Real SOC1 and 2’s, carrier oversight, IT costs, staff costs lead the way. Your (and others) shining the light on some predatory TPA practices has been painful for many bad actors. The industry will be smaller, and hopefully better in the long run.

The net

TRISTAR is a consolidator, and this latest transaction is strategically sensible. It adds depth in a key market sector and a key geographic area for TRISTAR, while also building TRISTAR’s internal managed care operation.

Tomorrow – other big doings in the TPA space.

What does this mean for you?

Watch what the smart people are doing. 


Feb
1

Acquisitions & takeaways therefrom, part 1

Two recent acquisitions and one possible transaction provide insight into investors’ views of the workers’ comp services sector.

Spoiler takeaway – Size is good; a) up to a point, b) as long as the additions strengthen management, add solid revenue and are strategic.

Paradigm acquires HomeCare Connect and TRISTAR acquires Risico.

Paradigm Outcomes’ acquisition of HomeCare Connect makes a ton of sense – as does TRISTAR’s purchase of Risico. We’ll dive into the first today, the second tomorrow, and the possible transaction later this week.

HomeCare Connect provides home care, DME, prosthetics and other services to workers with significant injuries…a population exactly the same as Paradigm’s. By internalizing these services, Paradigm:

  • gains control over a key part of the care continuum, thereby streamlining communications and service delivery;
  • adds strong management talent (I’m a big fan of HCC leaders Vonesa Wenzel, Teresa Williams and Tim Rametta);
  • increases HomeCare Connect’s revenue by funneling Paradigm cases through HCC; and
  • adds significant revenues (my guess is $60 million+…but that’s just a guess) to its top line and earnings to the bottom line.

I spoke with Paradigm CEO John Watts, here are a few quotes from that conversation, takeaways that point to Paradigm’s evolution and strategy.

    • “almost every case we manage involves durable medical equipment and home healthcare”
    • With (those services managed in-house, “it is seamless to the injured worker and provides more continuity as we are able to stay on the case longer.”
    • “HCC has very strong leadership that is already thinking about other opportunities…they have a really interesting solutions for prosthetics…”
    • Paradigm has “historically has dealt with high-severity claims, usually in the $1.5 to $2 million range.We are expanding the types of claims we work with to include lower-severity cases including those that need DME and HHC…HomeCare Connect’s solutions are a key part of our  service set…”
    • “As we continue to evolve our value-based solutions, we will extend our focus to events that are more episodic in nature…shoulder injuries for example…where our focus on return to work and reducing cost are essential value drivers for the market.”

Paradigm is clearly focused on capturing more of the services delivered to its current patient population, while moving “down the severity ladder” to handle less severely injured patients.

And…the final quote is pretty interesting as it implies expanding beyond fee-for-service into value-based care and financial models. 

I’d be remiss if I didn’t add what I see as one of the bigger benefits of the acquisition for Paradigm – HCC execs and staff get workers’ comp, understand the critical nuances and needs of front-line adjusters and case managers, and also know what drives decision makers.

From Vonesa Wenzel:

    • “It is all about the integrity of your organization and that you can be trusted by your clients to do the right thing for them, and also for the injured worker. You have to earn your client’s trust.”
    • “It’s important to understand that expectations of what folks need at the desk level may be different than corporate level decision makers.”

 What does this mean for you?

Focusing on your end users’ needs, wants, problems, and foibles = success.