After the original post (below) I had a chance to review more carefully the recent releases from Texas re the adoption of medical treatment and guidelines and to gain more insight into the guideline selection process.
First, a clarification. ODG guidelines WILL be used for management of physical medicine, including physical therapy.
That said, if physicians or other stakeholders want to provide any type of treatment that differs from that recommended by ODG (surgery, therapy, etc), they can provide information to the payer/state justifying their position. And if their treatment plan is supported by other evidence-based medical guidelines, my sense is it will be approved.
Sources also indicate that MDA’s disability duration guidelines were selected primarily due to their accessibility; they are easier to comprehend and more “usable” for laypeople, while still backed by solid research and data. This accessibility may well make conversations among the stakeholders more productive and reduce confusion and mis-interpretation.
That’s good, as it allows providers and payers to have a discussion about treatment options with science-based guidelines as the ultimate test of appropriateness.
The latest state to adopt clinical guidelines for the treatment of workers comp injuries is Texas. While the adoption of guidelines is a good thing, Texas is clearly marching to its own mariachi band.
Insight, analysis & opinion from Joe Paduda