Mar
4

The jobs boom

Gas prices are up, there are concerns about inflation, and some shortages continue – that’s the bad news.

The good news is the hiring boom that’s been going on for over a year shows no signs of abating, AND wage increases seem to have moderated a bit – which may be good news on the inflation front.

As a result, unemployment is down to 3.8% – a great number by any standard.

From the New York Times:

Job openings are near a record high. Layoffs are at a new low. And hiring has remained strong in the ebb and flow of successive waves of the pandemic — employers have added at least 400,000 jobs every month since May, the longest such streak on record. [emphasis added]

The economy is moving in the right direction; things are looking solid for a robust 2022 indeed.

What does this mean for you?

More workers = more health insurance and workers’ comp premium dollars.


Mar
1

Stuff you should know

When Physician Management Companies took over anesthesia practices, the units (amount of services) and prices went up dramatically (when compared to other practices).

As in 16.5% and 18.7% respectively.

No surprise, prices went up even more – as in 26% – if the PMCs were owned by private equity companies.

The fine folks at WorkCompCentral published the news that OptumRx settled with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts over the Commonwealth’s claim that OptumRx failed to follow workers’ compensation prescription drug pricing procedures. OptumRx agreed to pay the state $5.8 million. The settlement is here.

I’m trying to get more detail on this as the Commonwealth’s press release is a bit confusing.  You’ll know if/when we get more details.

Finally, the conspiracy theory that somehow COVID came from a lab has been put to rest – at least for those of us who believe in science. Somehow I doubt the tin foil hat crowd will accept the news that the virus originated in the Wuhan market.

Where COVID originated 

From Michael Worobey, a co-author on both studies and an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona via Medscape “When you look at all the evidence together, it’s an extraordinarily clear picture that the pandemic started at the Wuhan market…”

More details on the two studies:

In one study, researchers used spatial analysis to show that the earliest COVID-19 cases, which were diagnosed in December 2019, were linked to the market. Researchers also found that environmental samples that tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus were associated with animal vendors.

In another study, researchers found that two major viral lineages of the coronavirus resulted from at least two events when the virus spread from animals into humans. The first transmission most likely happened in late November or early December 2019, they wrote, and the other likely happened a few weeks later.

There’s an excellent synopsis of the research and methodologies here. If you want to weigh in, please review the article at the link first.

What does this mean for you?

For-profit healthcare can be very problematic, and science always wins.

We are all shocked and heartsick over Putin’s War on Ukraine – if you want to help Ukraine and Ukrainians, please consider a contribution to Care. Care is a very reputable and highly effective NGO with a rich history of successfully mitigating disasters and helping people.


Feb
28

My apologies for the previous attempt to post this…a picture in the post somehow blocked the view of the body of the post.

What’s the deal with long-term COVID?

Why are facility costs increasing and where?

How will labor market disruptions affect work comp?

These and other questions will be addressed in Boston March 16 and 17 at WCRI’s Issues and Research Conference. I caught up with WCRI CEO John Ruser and Communications Director Andrew Kenneally to get the scoop.

remember these days…?

[Register here…don’t put it off as this often sells out]

COVID

26 months into the COVID era we know a lot more about the short-term health impacts of COVID (and associated medical costs and duration) but we’re only starting to understand how COVID infections affect us – and may impact work comp – over the long term. Dr Ruser noted the:

“majority of COVID claims are short duration and most don’t have medical expense, things that are going to surprise us may well be long covid associated (issues)…(we are) doing studies on covid claims and persistence in terms of services provided that WC payers are covering”

Denise Algire, Dan Allen, and Craig Ross DO are the panelists for a discussion of the workplace “after” COVID; mandates, return to worksites, and medical care are all on the docket. [I’m not sure there will ever be an “after” COVID; more likely we’re entering a “COVID era.”]

Facility costs

WCRI’s members have identified facility costs (inpatient and outpatient hospital and ambulatory surgery facility) as a key concern; one of the biggest drivers is provider consolidation.  Dr Bogdan Savych and Dr Sebastian Negrusa will discuss their research into the effect of provider consolidation on workers’ comp medical payments; Dr Ruser:

WCRI’s stakeholders raised this as a top issue…there will be some eyebrows raised as there hasn’t been research on the impact of vertical and horizontal integration’s effect on workers comp. We will discuss the implications for costs from both vertical integration and the acquisition of Primary care practices by larger health systems.

More on this issue here here and here.

Employment

The estimable Dr Bob Hartwig will educate and engage as only he can. Somehow Dr Hartwig manages to make the densest of topics relevant and entertaining. With employment a key driver of all things workers’ comp;

“disruptions in labor markets are going to have lasting impacts on the way we work and on workers’ comp claims. Bob Hartwig is coming to talk about these disruptions and their implications for workers’ comp”

What does this mean for you?
All in all, a festival of facts, a cornucopia of content,  await us in Boston…along with a most-needed opportunity to see old friends and, dare I say…shake hands?


Feb
25

What’s the deal with long-term COVID?

Why are facility costs increasing and where?

How will labor market disruptions affect work comp?

These and other questions will be addressed in Boston March 16 and 17 at WCRI’s Issues and Research Conference. I caught up with WCRI CEO John Ruser and Communications Director Andrew Kenneally to get the scoop.

remember these days…?_DSC2004.jpg

[Register here…don’t put it off as this often sells out]

COVID

26 months into the COVID era we know a lot more about the short-term health impacts of COVID (and associated medical costs and duration) but we’re only starting to understand how COVID infections affect us – and may impact work comp – over the long term. Dr Ruser noted the:

“majority of COVID claims are short duration and most don’t have medical expense, things that are going to surprise us may well be long covid associated (issues)…(we are) doing studies on covid claims and persistence in terms of services provided that WC payers are covering”

Denise Algire, Dan Allen, and Craig Ross DO are the panelists for a discussion of the workplace “after” COVID; mandates, return to worksites, and medical care are all on the docket. [I’m not sure there will ever be an “after” COVID; more likely we’re entering a “COVID era.”]

Facility costs

WCRI’s members have identified facility costs (inpatient and outpatient hospital and ambulatory surgery facility) as a key concern; one of the biggest drivers is provider consolidation.  Dr Bogdan Savych and Dr Sebastian Negrusa will discuss their research into the effect of provider consolidation on workers’ comp medical payments; Dr Ruser:

WCRI’s stakeholders raised this as a top issue…there will be some eyebrows raised as there hasn’t been research on the impact of vertical and horizontal integration’s effect on workers comp. We will discuss the implications for costs from both vertical integration and the acquisition of Primary care practices by larger health systems.

More on this issue here here and here.

Employment

The estimable Dr Bob Hartwig will educate and engage as only he can. Somehow Dr Hartwig manages to make the densest of topics relevant and entertaining. With employment a key driver of all things workers’ comp;

“disruptions in labor markets are going to have lasting impacts on the way we work and on workers’ comp claims. Bob Hartwig is coming to talk about these disruptions and their implications for workers’ comp”

What does this mean for you?
All in all, a festival of facts, a cornucopia of content,  await us in Boston…along with a most-needed opportunity to see old friends and, dare I say…shake hands?


Feb
14

Hospital CEO pay ≠ Outcomes

An excellent piece by Merrill Goozner highlighted – among other things – the disconnect between not-for-profit hospital CEO pay and their hospital’s ability to control costs. 

Merrill cited the Lown Institute’s analysis of hospital performance, DEI results, outcomes, cost and pay equity

Since 1996, hospital costs have risen about 2 1/2 times faster than overall inflation…

Why?

Quoting Merrill..

You’d think the boards of trustees at the nation’s non-profit hospitals, which account for 80% of all staffed beds in this country, would be up in arms over top management’s inability to keep prices and thereby patient costs under control. At the least, they might want to incentivize their chief executive officers and other C-suite staff to take cost control seriously.

Nope.

up to 40% of a CEO’s bonus depended on measures that directly affect hospital finances.

Not for profit hospitals are a BIG part our healthcare problem; most don’t care about rising healthcare costs, and they don’t tightly link CEO compensation to clinical outcomes.

Now I know why I had to pay $355 for ear wax removal.

What does this mean for you?

Hospital leaders’ and their boards’ priorities are not ours. 

Subscribe to Merrill’s posts here.


Feb
3

Stuff you should know

In my ongoing effort to help you, dear reader, stay informed and on top of important stuff, I have this email folder titled “Blog Fodder” wherein I park news items worthy of your attention.

Here’s the fodder filling the folder these days…

Cash assistance = potentially smarter kids

A really interesting – and important – study found that babies of mothers that had received cash assistance had increased brain activity when compared to mom’s without cash assistance. From the study…

The resultant brain activity patterns have been shown to be associated with the development of subsequent cognitive skills.

WCRI’s Annual confab will include a session on Drug Formularies and the impact thereof. Register for the meeting here.

The good folks at Ametros collaborated on a study assessing CMS’ denial of payments for work comp-related claims. Evidently some folks thought this didn’t happen…turns out it does. Extrapolating from a random sample, researchers estimate CMS denied 36 thousand claims annually from 2018 to 2020.

Hear all about it in their February 15 webinar; register here.  And download the report here.

COVID good news.

From the NYT, the CDC released a study showing:

[boosters] are 90 percent effective against hospitalization with the [Omicron] variant, the agency reported. Booster shots also reduced the likelihood of a visit to an emergency department or urgent care clinic. The extra doses were most effective against infection and death among Americans aged 50 and older…

How effective for us oldsters?

VERY..unvaccinated Americans between 50 and 64 were 44 times more likely to end up in the hospital with Covid than those in the age group who were vaccinated and received a booster shot.

And really good news; from Charles Gaba, the uninsured rate for U.S. population was 8.9% for the third quarter of 2021 (July – September 2021), down from 10.3% for the last quarter of 2020 – corresponding to roughly 4.6 million more people with coverage over that time period.


Jan
31

COVID, Science, and “Natural” Immunity

There’s a good deal of confusion out there about “natural” immunity and COVID.

Here are the facts.

first, there’s no such thing as “artificial” immunity. ALL immunity is natural…whether one is infected by COVID or gets a vaccination, the body has a natural response.

Virologist Stuart Neil: 

all a vaccine does is prime the immune system with a dead pathogen, a protein (or part of a protein from it), or a related but harmless pathogen so that the body can respond so much more quickly when the actual pathogen is actually encountered…

second, if you want to protect against a COVID infection, would you rather:

a) get a vaccine that is FDA approved, has been proven safe and effective, or:

b) get infected with COVID.

Sure, there can be side effects from COVID vaccines (a family member had a pretty nasty albeit brief headache and chill episode after his/her second Moderna  jab, but I had no side effects from any of my three Pfizer shots). Balance that against the potentially much worse illness – or death – from a real COVID infection, and the choice is pretty obvious.

third, multiple recent studies prove that previous COVID infections are NOT as effective at preventing future COVID infections as are vaccines. Summary findings from two:

This study “found that the chances of these adults testing positive for COVID-19 were 5.49 times higher in unvaccinated people who had COVID-19 in the past than they were for those who had been vaccinated for COVID and had not had an infection before.”

And this one “indicates that if you had COVID-19 before and are not vaccinated, your risk of getting re-infected is more than two times higher than for those who got vaccinated after having COVID-19.”

Finally, if you were unlucky enough to have contracted COVID AND smart enough to get fully vaccinated, you’re even less likely to get COVID again.

Sure, there’s a LOT of misinformation out there, including this total distortion/misstatement/nonsense (just one – it was conducted BEFORE “most persons had received additional or booster COVID-19 vaccine doses to protect against waning immunity. (Actual study is here.)

But hey, if you want to fight science, go right ahead. Just remember what happened to Wile E Coyote when he denied gravity’s existence…

Oh, and if you do fall off the cliff, don’t get upset if healthcare workers are less than sympathetic.

What does this mean for you?

Get vaccinated. Wear a mask.

and a hat tip to Bill F for alerting me to the issue!


Jan
27

COVID update

Two years (almost) to the day and we’re still talking about &^%$(*# COVID…

OK, here’s the latest.

DATA

73 million confirmed cases in the U.S.

876 thousand COVID-related deaths.

that’s 12 deaths per thousand cases.

that, dear reader, is a very high case mortality rate.

Here’s a comparison of death rates (NOT case mortality rates) for flu vs COVID.

Long-term impact

A study published in JAMA of one-year outcomes for patients who survived ICU treatment in Holland found:

  • 74.3% reported physical symptoms,
  • 26.2% reported mental symptoms, and
  • 16.2% reported cognitive symptoms.

More specifically, patients self-reported issues with fatigue, mental symptoms, depression, PTSD, anxiety, and indications of cognitive failure.

NCCI’s webinar on COVID’s impact on work comp is up for viewing here.  Highly recommended.

Vaccination data

Excellent ongoing reporting from the Kaiser Family Foundation; latest data is here.

Overall 73% of us are vaccinated

Couple head-slapping statistics…

Republicans used to be the rational party, or at least the party of rationality. That’s a stunning disparity.

Here’s why the unvaxxed are unvaxxed…

What does this mean for you?

Get vaccinated and boosted, and wear a mask. COVID doesn’t care about your political affiliations.

 


Jan
25

(Most) private insurers aren’t controlling costs

The prices private insurers have paid to hospitals and physicians have increased much faster than prices paid by Medicare and Medicaid.

And it’s not because providers are cost-shifting.

Those are the main takeaways from a just-released CBO report; here’s what CBO said (emphasis added):

  • commercial insurers pay much higher prices for hospitals’ and physicians’ services than Medicare FFS does.
  • In addition, the prices that commercial insurers pay hospitals are much higher than hospitals’ costs.
  • Paying higher prices to providers can have several effects.
    • First, it can increase insurers’ spending on claims, which may lead to higher premiums, greater cost-sharing requirements for patients...
    • Second, it can increase the federal government’s subsidies for health care .
    • And third, it can slow the growth of wages.
  • The share of providers’ patients who are covered by Medicare and Medicaid is not related to higher prices paid by commercial insurers. That finding suggests that providers do not raise the prices they negotiate with commercial insurers to offset lower prices paid by government programs (a concept known as cost shifting).

Ok, that said, these are findings based on national data…things are different market to market.

I’d note that price increases in workers’ comp correlates with states’ Medicaid expansion. That is, price inflation is generally much higher in states that did NOT expand medicaid.

More on that here.

What does that mean for you?

Private insurers aren’t doing their job very well.

 


Jan
21

COVID, Comp, Claims and Costs

Yesterday NCCI and several state bureaus and research organizations put on an excellent webinar on COVID’s’ impact on Workers’Compensation. The analysis covered 2020 data from 45 states. The full report is available here.

Quick takes

In 2020 about 80,000 COVID claims were accepted in the 45 states at an average cost of $7,800 per claim.

There’s a LOT of interstate variation, with COVID accounting for 1% of claims in Montana and 29% in Kentucky.  The high rate in KY was somewhat higher than rates in MN; in all other states except NJ COVID claims accounted around 15% or less of total claims. The high percentages appear to be due to presumption laws which were quite broad in Kentucky and Minnesota.

Median was 7.2%…

Aa a percentage of incurred loss, COVID accounted for about 1.7% of incurred losses in the median state. Again there was a wide range, from 0.2% (Alabama) to 12% (D.C.)

COVID claims are diabolically opposite from “regular” work comp claims in that 88% of COVID claims are lost time claims compared to about 2% for “regular” claims. COVID claims are also closing earlier than “regular” claims.

There were 13% fewer Non-COVID claims in 2020 than in 2019; recall there’s been a long-standing annual structural decline in claims of about 3.8%.

The net is non-COVID claims dropped three times more than expected…correlation is not causation, but in this case it’s darn close.

NCCI used polls for audience reaction; the first questions was how impactful COVID direct losses will be on the WC system moving forward.

The responses were puzzling at best.  Clearly COVID claims have NOT been costly – far from it. In 2020 COVID claims accounted for $630 million in incurred losses – just 1/50th of total incurred losses.

Yet almost half (!!!) of respondents said COVID direct losses would be at least moderately impactful.

That, dear reader, makes zero sense.

  • The math alone doesn’t support that belief, and workers’ comp folks are supposed to get math.
  • There hasn’t been any material change in presumption laws, so that can’t be it.
  • But there’s been far too much Chicken Little-ing about COVID.

My guess is that Chicken Little-ing has somehow convinced many that something that a) will be transitory and b) hasn’t been costly and c) is getting ever loss costly to treat will somehow become a far bigger problem than it is.

What does this mean for you?

C’mon people. Stop with the catastrophizing.

So, one really cool thing about the webinar – almost all of the presenters were women. Gotta love that.