Jul
24

PMSI sale – the numbers

In today’s earnings announcement, AmerisourceBergen, parent company of work comp PBM/ancillary services firm PMSI, detailed the financial impact of the deal.
ABC carried PMSI on the books at about $260 million; by selling the property for $40 million (plus a $10 million contingency) ABC will be taking a $222 million hit as a result of the transaction. On an earnings per share basis the result is 1.37 per share, giving ABC a net loss of $108 million, or 67 cents per share.
Observers who are confused about the recent on-again, off-again status of the PMSI sale can be forgiven for that confusion; ABC has been somewhat schizophrenic about its dealings with PMSI. After putting PMSI on the market early this year, ABC announced last month that the company was not going to sell PMSI after the initial offers came in well under expectations. According to ABC’s CEO David Yost, “We look to PMSI to be on track in the September quarter and into fiscal ’09.”
Contrast this with Yost’s announcement today – “We were very disappointed with PMSI’s performance in this quarter, and after re-evaluating our alternatives, we decided to sell the PMSI workers’ compensation business in order to focus our full attention on our pharmaceutical distribution and related businesses and allow H.I.G. to focus on the opportunities at PMSI.”
ABC’s impatience with the turnaround may have played a role, but from here it looks like the hammering Yost took over ABC’s overall financial performance to date may have been more of a motivator.
HIG, the investment firm that bought PMSI does have some experience in this space with investments in Align Networks and Gould and Lamb. They have been quite successful in selling properties and generating rich returns for their investors, a history that bodes well for PMSI. And for the PMSI employees who add value, are flexible, focus on customers, and don’t buy into the “we do it that way because that’s the way we’ve always done it” nonsense.


Jul
24

PMSI sold, MSC/Express Deal closes

PMSI, the workers comp PBM and ancillary services provider, will announce today that it has been sold to investment firm HIG. Sources within PMSI indicate the stock deal is worth $50 million, of which $10 million is contingent on achieving certain performance measures. Current management will likely remain in place after the deal closes in about 60 days.
The timing of this transaction is coincident with Express Script’s announcement of the closing (sub req) of their acquisition of MSC’s Pharmacy Benefit Management business. Express Scripts is now poised to become one of, if not the largest workers comp PBMs.
These deals are the latest in a series of financial transactions and potential transactions involving work comp PBMs. Cypress Care was recapitalized by investor Brazos Private Equity in November, 2006; Fiserv sought to sell its third party biller/PBM business early last year; Coventry purchased First Script as part of the Concentra transaction, and MSC itself was purchased by Monitor Clipper early in 2005.
PMSI has been struggling of late, losing the Hartford’s business (while retaining SRS (Hartford’s TPA)) to ESI and CNA late last year to Coventry. While PMSI’s parent company, Amerisource Bergen, was somewhat of a distant parent and may not have provided the attention and resources necessary for PMSI to maintain its historical leadership position, there’s no question HIG’s focus and attention will be intense and constant. Private equity management can be quite helpful; it can also be overbearing and short-sighted. And sometimes all three – which may be exactly what PMSI needs to recover its leadership position.
At risk of being accused of burying the lead, here’s what has me puzzled. Sources indicate Express looked closely at PMSI – recently . Yet they plunked down $248 million for MSC’s pharmacy business, when they could have paid a fifth of that for all of PMSI (which includes a robust ancillary services division).
PMSI has been somewhat damaged goods lately due to customer losses, yet MSC was in a similar position less than two years ago after it lost its largest PBM customer, Liberty Mutual, to rival Progressive Medical (PM had half of Liberty and was awarded MSC’s portion).
From here, it looks like a pretty good deal – although PMSI’s financials have been pretty bad lately, $50 million is a very good deal for one of the top two companies in a growing market.


Jul
18

New York gets real

Bowing to the reality of the market, the New York Work Comp Board has issued a revised pharmacy fee schedule for workers comp.
The previous fee schedule based WC pharmacy fees on Medicaid – a linkage that was problematic for at least a dozen reasons. Here are the major ones.
1. Medicaid has ‘positive enrollment’ – members’ eligibility is determined instantly, electronically. In WC, there is no upfront enrollment, therefore retail pharmacies don’t know where to send the claim, or even if the claim has been accepted by an insurer. Work comp requires a lot of manual work, while Medicaid is electronic and instant.
2. The Medicaid reimbursement schedule has been a political football of late, as state legislators, under pressure from declining revenues and increasing service demands, have looked to cut Medicaid costs by cutting prices paid for drugs. California’s decision to cut reimbursement by 10% has resulted in a political/judicial back and forth that is apparently still not resolved. By tying WC reimbursement to Medicaid, pharmacies, PBMs, and payers would be batted back and forth, not knowing from day to day what they should pay for drugs.
3. Medicaid has a formulary which reduces the cost of the drugs to the pharmacies. There is no such formulary in WC (except in a very few states such as Washington), and therefore drug manufacturers won’t give discounts in return for preference in a therapeutic class.
4. The Medicaid FS is actually significantly lower than the contracted prices PBMs pay retail pharmacies. Thus there is no benefit to payers, or retail pharmacies, in working with PBMs. This despite the strong evidence that PBMs, properly implemented and managed, can dramatically reduce utilization (the volume of scripts dispensed).
What drove NY to make the change? Access issues. Claimants were not able to get their scripts filled as pharmacies could not afford to do so under Medicaid reimbursement, and PBMs could not afford to operate in the state while losing money on every script.
That’s not to say the revised FS is much better. In fact, as the second lowest fee schedule in the nation, it represents an incremental improvement at best, and may not be sufficient to keep all stakeholders participating.
Cynics may point to California, and note that PBMs and pharmacies stayed in that market after the FS was based on Medicaid. True, but each state’s Medicaid FS is unique, and CA’s is significantly more reasonable than NY’s.


Jun
16

MSC and Express Scripts – future plans

So the purchase of MSC Pharmacy Services by Express Scripts will be finalized within a few weeks; what’s next?
It is way too early to tell, as the announcement hit the street just last Friday. That said, from discussions with sources from both Express and MSC Pharmacy Services it is clear that some heavy thinking has been going on for some time.
(Note I’m using MSC Pharmacy Services as that is the entity that was purchased by ESI; the other part of legacy company MSC remains ‘behind’ and will keep the MSC brand identity)
There’s the usual corporate-PR speak in the companies’ press releases, but folks involved in the discussions point to a few areas that bear watching. First out of the gate is MSC’s Oasis web portal. Their web app enables customers to access information in summary and drill down format, create reports, and keep track of specific claimants. ESI’s customers may be moved onto Oasis as systems integration efforts progress; this will not be an overnight move as it will require back- and front-end integration with customer, clinical, and processor applications.
MSC Pharmacy Services currently uses processor Restat as their network administrator; I’d expect to see the combined company move quickly onto Express’ platform and use Express’ network contracts. This would reduce MSC’s admin expense and likely improve rebate income as well.
Expect to see some consolidation of clinical programs; neither legacy company has a complete suite of services and the combined offering will almost certainly be stronger than each firm’s solo effort.
Something that has not been discussed, but has been alluded to in public statements is the possibility of cross selling ESI/MSC’s core offerings to their respective customers. This would entail ESI helping MSC sell DME, home health, imaging, etc to their customers and MSC cross selling PBM services to ESI’s customers.
Finally, while it is likely there will be a few folks looking for employment elsewhere, those decisions have not been finalized. MSC Pharmacy Services’ executive management is solid and well-regarded, as is ESI’s. I’d expect the headhunters are already circling…


Jun
9

Drugs in Workers Comp – inflation is down, PBMs are up

The Fifth Annual Survey of Prescription Drug Management in Workers Comp has been completed, and copies of the Public version of the report are available at no charge. (email infoAThealthstrategyassocDOTcom)
A few late respondents contributed significantly to the report, and their data also moved the figures around a bit. Here are a few key statistics.
Drug inflation for 2007 was 4.9% (looking at the increase in total dollars for 2007 over 2006).
Generic utilization was in the high seventies, with generic efficiency in the ninety-percent range.
Essentially all larger payers are now using PBMs, although are many are not using them as effectively as they could be. PBMs’ clinical, reporting, outreach, paper bill processing, and related capabilities are not being utilized to their fullest by all but a very few payers.
The use of home delivery has jumped and is close to 5% across all respondents. This is a major improvement over a couple years ago, when it was in the 2% range for most payers.
And finally, the first fill capture rate is in the low twenties – although half of the respondents did not have the figure readily available.
Copies of past surveys are available here.


May
22

More controversy on drug pricing

It’s minutiae time again!
That is, if pricing in a $216 billion industry is minutiae.
Readers interested in pharmaceutical pricing may recall the court case 18 months ago wherein pharma pricing publisher First Databank was accused of intentionally inflating drug prices. (FDB’s version of AWP results in prices that are about 5% higher than those provided by the other sources.)
There’s a new lawsuit alleging drug distributor McKesson illegally manipulated brand name drug pricing by increasing the spread between WAC (wholesale acquisition cost) and AWP (average wholesale price) – a practice that increased the prices paid by insurers, consumers, and employers.
The suit was filed by the City of San Francisco in US District Court in Boston – the same court that heard the 2006 case.
The 2006 case involved FDB’s selection of McKesson as the sole source of drug pricing data. FDB’s AWP was based on the actual price that McKesson paid for the drug, plus a margin. For years the typical margin was 20%; six years ago McKesson changed the margin to 25% to make it ‘simpler to administer pricing internally’. (this is the same allegation referenced in the most recent suit)
The price increase also earned McKesson points with its customers, retail pharmacies, who saw an immediate increase in profitability – profits on Lipitor immediately jumped three-fold after the 2002 increase. As part of the settlement in the 2006 case, FDB agreed to stop publishing prices two years after the finalization of the settlement.
Surprise! The settlement is not yet final, thus FDB continues to publish its version of AWP, the version that inflates payer drug costs by 5%.
Both suits, along with a number of other legal actions, have been filed by the Prescription Access Litigation Project, a Boston-based group funded by several foundations and charitable organizations.
The PAL folks are tenacious, well-funded, and allied with, among other heavy hitters, AARP. While tiny, their ability to win cases, highlight possible illegal activity and focus attention on their cause is impressive.
What does this mean for you?
At a time when more Americans than ever are taking drugs regularly, every penny matters. Watch PAL and their progress carefully – their work will likely have a significant impact on pharmaceutical pricing methodologies.
Thanks to California HealthLine for the tip.


May
14

Drug costs in workers comp – and the answer is

I’ve just about completed compiling results of the Fifth Annual Survey of Prescription Drug Management in Workers Comp. While the report won’t be completed for a couple weeks, here are a few factoids that are rather compelling.
Drug trend continues to moderate, with inflation in 2007 coming in at 4.3%. That’s a big improvement over last year’s 6.5%, which was a big improvement over the previous year’s 9.5%…
Generic fills (the percentage of scripts that are filled with generics) looks to be in the high seventy percent range, with generic efficiency around 90% (that’s the percentage of scripts that could be filled with generics that are).
New this year is a question about first fill capture rate, defined as the percentage of initial scripts that are routed through the PBM’s network. This is starting to get attention, with the average respondent rating it just under ‘very important’. That doesn’t mean they have the data – about half of the twenty payers surveyed couldn’t identify their first fill rate. Of those who could, the numbers indicate about one-fifth of initial scripts are in-network.
Many of the survey respondents (primarily large and mid-size carriers, state funds, and TPAs) have a lot more insight into their drug spend, know what the cost drivers are, and the ones with the lowest inflation have all put programs in place to clinically manage drugs.
Thanks to all the folks who set aside time to help with the survey – you know who you are.


May
12

A few facts about Pharmacy Management in Workers Comp

I’m knee deep in my annual survey of pharmacy management in workers’ comp, and if I look at one more column of data I’m going to need a few class 2’s myself.
So in the interest of my sanity, here are a few early findings from the survey.
Inflation looks to be down from last year’s 6.5%, marking the fifth consecutive year of ‘decreases in the rate of increase’. More detail to follow on what’s causing the decline, but preliminary review indicates the focus on utilization is continuing to reduce the volume and type of drugs dispensed. As NCCI has noted, utilization is significantly more important cost driver than price.
Clinical programs are getting better, more targeted, more sophisticated, and more effective. A focus on addressing high cost claimants is almost universal among the best performing payers – this may seem blindingly obvious, but requires one to have data, know what to look for, and be able to develop and implement programs to attack the issue.
I try to use the same questions each year so we can track trends and changes in the industry. But new things, points of interest, and queries come in each year which requires that some old and not-as-interesting-any-more questions have to get dropped to make room for the new stuff.
This year we added questions on generic efficiency and fill rates. While the analysis is not yet complete, and a couple more respondents are going to send their data in, the preliminary figures indicate the average generic fill rate is right around 70%, with generic efficiency (the percentage of scripts that could be filled with generics that are) around 90%.
This is an average – types of business written and managed, jurisdictional nuances, data availability, accuracy, and consistency all make this stat somewhat questionable.
That said, better to start asking then to wait for perfection.
Thanks to Cypress Care for sponsoring the survey for the third consecutive year.


Apr
29

News from the Workers Comp pharmacy world

Here, in no particular order, are some findings gleaned from my wanderings around the show floor at RIMS in San Diego.
MSC has rebounded nicely from the loss of Liberty Mutual’s pharmacy business last year (awarded entirely to Progressive Medical). Sources indicate MSC’s run rate is back above where it was when Liberty terminated the business, primarily from a few wins and no appreciable losses in the interim. Kudos to CEO Joe Delaney, COO Mitch Freeman et al – while the ship may not be altogether righted, they have done a remarkable job in turning the company around.
Progressive Medical is also doing well, adding some incremental business while maintaining its reputation for stellar customer service.
Cypress Care (an HSA consulting client) is on a strong growth track, closing major deals with the California Insurance Guarantee Ass’n and Pennsylvania’s state fund (SWIF). Sources indicate Cypress is close to a couple other significant deals.
Express Scripts has released its annual workers comp drug trends report. Here’s the link. Maybe that’s why all the red-shirted ESI staff were plastered with smiles.
Larry Marsh of Lehman Brothers issued a scathing report on AmerisourceBergen, taking company management to the woodshed for their inability to sell off sub PMSI/Tmesys. Marsh hammered ABC, lowering his eps forecast by $0.05 on the basis of the no-sale of PMSI alone. The PMSI folks are doing their best to ignore the goings-on at Corporate HQ; as noted earlier today their MSA division is pressing ahead and delivering solid results despite downward pressure on pricing in that fast-maturing sector.
Finally, one of the last remaining third party billers, Third Party Solutions, is reportedly on the block – again. Loyal readers (and industry geeks) will recall TPS was for sale about a year ago, with no takers. Now that TPS has bought WorkingRx, it looks like owner Fiserv is thinking someone will pony up big bucks to own a monopoly in that space.


Apr
23

UPDATE – PMSI sale is off

I reported last week that workers comp pharmacy benefit manager/DME supplier PMSI/Tmesys was near a deal to transfer the company from Amerisource Bergen to a new owner. Citigroup’s investment banking arm was retained to sell the property, and PMSI was put up for sale in late January.
Firm bids were requested from interested parties in early March.
Sources indicate Amerisource Bergen and Citigroup were in the final stages of negotiating the transaction with a financial buyer late last week, with the deal slated to be announced yesterday.
That deal is off, and Amerisource has pulled the plug on any sale. Evidently they were not able to get the price they wanted, and have decided to hold onto PMSI – for the time being.
Here’s how Amerisource characterized the situation:
The Valley Forge, Pennsylvania-based company said it will focus its efforts on turning around PMSI.
President and Chief Executive Officer David Yost said in a prepared statement, “Because the final bids did not reflect the turnaround value of the business (bold added), which we expect to capture, we will focus on significantly improving the business and delivering that value to shareholders.”
He said he expects PMSI to improve in the second half of this fiscal year and show improvement in fiscal year 2009.