Aug
5

COVID is crushing work comp claim counts.

Thank you, CWCI. Due to it’s diligence and foresight, we now know:

  • through June 30 there were 14,487 COVID claims reported to California’s DWC;
  • this amounts to 6.3% of all confirmed COVID cases (data from JHU);
  • the vast majority of COVID claims reported have been accepted;
  • and perhaps the most important data point…

Total claims (COVID and non-COVID) dropped 28.8% from the first half of 2019 to the first half of 2020. (note this is corrected from my original 36.4%)

Kudos to the fine folk at CWCI; they have produced the first data-based report on all things COVID. It is quite user-friendly, highly credible, and interactive, allowing users to analyze California-specific on COVID and non-COVID claims.  The tool enables comparison by industry, body part, nature and cause of injury, class code and region for claims (both filed claims and accepted claims) with dates of injury from 1/1/2020 to 6/30/2020.

The tool also allows users to compare actual claim counts for the same time period in 2019 to current and projected counts for 2020.

Claim counts, dear readers, is WAAAAAY more important than the rather minor financial impact COVID claims have had on workers’ comp. As I’ve reported previously, work comp COVID claims to date are not expensive; despite the prognostications of others, it is unlikely indeed COVID’s costs will have any material impact on work comp financials.

What WILL have an impact – and a very positive one – is the massive drop in total claim counts we’ve seen so far this year.

grey – 2019; green – 2020

Yeah, I know, this is California-specific, and only for half a year, and not fully developed, and all that stuff. I also know a 36% drop in total claim counts is the biggest thing to hit the workers’ comp industry in…forever. 

What does this mean to you?

Everything.


Aug
4

Mitchell’s Coventry acquisition – implications abound

The implications of Mitchell’s acquisition of Coventry’s workers’ comp business are broad, from insight into the future of M&A in workers’ comp services to impact on competitors. (press release is here) Today we’ll dive into a few of the top-line implications.

M&A

The $850 million price was likely driven largely by the network’s profits and sustained position as the work comp PPO industry leader… the PPO is by far the biggest revenue and margin generator for CWC (Coventry Workers’ Comp). The transaction also represents yet another step in the rapid consolidation in the work comp services industry.

Mitchell now owns the number 2 bill review application (by customer base), the largest medical management entity (Genex + Coventry), the largest case management business (a mixed blessing these days), and the dominant network. If it holds onto both PBMs, it will gain the number three position in that sector.

As I noted yesterday, Mitchell is likely off the major acquisition field for a good while. It has to fix its PBM business, integrate Coventry, develop and implement a customer outreach that ideally will result in more stuff being bought by more customers, ensure Coventry’s distributors (including bill review rivals Medata and Conduent) continue to offer Coventry’s network, all while dealing with COVID19’s impact on work comp and auto claims.

The other big players left in this business are OptumWC (network, PBM, ancillary services), Paradigm (cat case services and management, case management, some network and ancillary businesses), and One Call. The next tier includes bill review/document management company Conduent; physical medicine expert MedRisk and myMatrixx (number 2 PBM, both are HSA consulting clients).

I don’t see any of these entities scrambling to react to the deal; they’ve known about it for months, and outside of Optum and Conduent any impact is tangential.

Networks

Coventry’s PPO is the industry leader – and has been for decades. It has the most market share, is rated highest by customers, and its policy of demanding top billing in any state (primary network status) remains secure. Expect Genex to invest heavily in the PPO. This will secure its leadership position and hold off competition from newer entrants – primarily Optum.

Bill review

The market’s perception of Coventry’s bill review function indicates room for improvement. The chart below shows how BR buyers rated the top bill review entities’ customer service in a survey I conducted two years ago; service is THE key metric. [shoot me a comment if you want a copy of the survey, the comment won’t be published]

As I noted yesterday Conduent handles much of Coventry’s bill review; How Mitchell will address this is an interesting question.

If you’ve got additional questions, leave them in the comments section and I’ll do my best to get answers posted.

What does this mean for you?

Smart acquisition at a very good price makes Mitchell the leading entity in workers’ comp services. I wouldn’t worry too much about Mitchell gaining too much market power.


Aug
3

It’s done; Mitchell owns Coventry work comp

After almost 5 months of negotiations and COVID19-related delays, Mitchell International owns Coventry Workers’ Comp.

The price was around $875 million, with most of the value based on Coventry’s work comp PPO. The network is a cash machine, has been the industry leader since it started the work comp PPO business, and so far is holding off a new competitor – Optum – without too much difficulty. Press release is here.

Sources indicate Coventry will report up thru Genex, with current president and CEO Art Lynch staying on in that role.

Long time readers will recall Aetna tried to sell Coventry six years ago, an effort that failed due to what can only be described as ignorance on the part of Aetna; whoever was responsible for the deal didn’t understand that network contracts were the linchpin.

What’s next?

Way back in March I dug into this in detail, here’s an edited excerpt:

Now that Coventry will be owned by a workers’ comp entity run by people who know workers’ comp, I’d expect a pretty significant investment into the core asset – the PPO.

That will undoubtedly include building and staffing a network contracting and management capability – from scratch. In the interim, one can assume M/G will use Aetna’s technology and perhaps contracting/credentialing resources until it has completed building a network management capability. M/G will do everything possible to build that network management capability quickly and well.

Quick takes

Mitchell is likely out of the acquisition game for some time. Digesting Coventry while battling thru a no-end-in-sight COVID crisis is going to consume management’s time and focus.

If anything, the company might sell it’s PBM business, a move that would free up management time that’s been focused on a business that has been rather challenged – and generate cash to pay down older and quite expensive debt.

I know, combining Coventry’s PBM – First Script – with Mitchell Pharmacy Solutions would create a third significant player to compete with Optum and myMatrixx. But…

  • First Script has suffered from chronic under-investment,
  • Express Scripts (myMatrixx’ parent company) provides First Script’s pharmacy network,
  • the work comp PBM business is brutally competitive,
  • selling the PBM businesses would free up cash to help lower debt, and
  • management time is needed to
    • integrate the rest of Coventry’s assets,
    • strengthen the network,
    • figure out what to do about Coventry’s bill review operation (most is handled by Mitchell competitor Conduent) (myMatrixx is an HSA consulting client), and
    • manage thru COVID.

It is possible Mitchell will hold onto the PBM, but there isn’t a compelling business case. And no, the “bill review and PBM synergy” argument isn’t it.

Bill review

Coventry’s bill review function runs mostly on Conduent’s platform. This will (very) likely change – the question is when.

Mitchell will want to cut costs and increase cash flow by switching customers over to a Mitchell platform. That is no simple task; systems connections and data feeds are business-critical; state reporting; integration with UR, claims, and financial systems as well as external vendors and other entities are notoriously complex and will take quite a while to build out.

This:

  • in an industry that chronically under-invests in IT, and
  • at a time when insurers and TPAs are staring a in the face of a 20% reduction in claims volume and accompanying drop in premiums.

What does this mean for you?

Consolidation continues, Coventry’s network should get better.

Tomorrow – a deeper dive into implications.


Jul
31

COVID update – vaccines, denier death, and prognostications

Lots of news COVID-related this week…

Three vaccines seem to be the most promising; all are entering Phase 3 trials with tens of thousands of test subjects involved.  Moderna and Pfizer look to be the furthest along, with AstraZenica/Oxford University’s vaccine also showing some promise.

Before we pop the champagne, remember…

  • trials are just that – they are used to assess safety, effectiveness (how much protection the vaccine provides) durability (how long the vaccine provides immunity)
  • the history of vaccine development is not exactly encouraging, and
  • once a vaccine is proven, we’ll need tens of millions of needles, syringes, vials, and a delivery system to ensure it all gets to the people who need it most.

There’s another problem with these trials – too few people of color are involved – far too few. That’s really troubling, as Black and Latinx people are suffering much more than Caucasians.

So, keep doing smart stuff until you get vaccinated. Fortunately, more of us are now accepting that masks make a big difference.

The death of former GOP Presidential candidate Herman Cain from coronavirus and the infection of Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert (R) may be changing minds; these two gentlemen dismissed the news about COVID19 and refused to wear masks.

Mr Cain is wearing the red tag.

Meanwhile, I’ve been engaging with NCCI and experts from the Insurance Information Institute in an effort to better understand the financial impact of COVID on workers’ comp. Stay tuned for more; key takeaway so far is that NCCI and III are focused on potential costs of COVID itself; they have not done any work assessing the impact of the sharp decline in claims.

There’s also a lot of talk about how bad COVID may be for profitability, a position I’m still struggling with.

What does this mean for you?

Wear a mask. 


Jul
24

Friday catch-up

COVID and client work has kept me way too busy this week – hope to be back to more frequent posting soon. Meanwhile, here’s what I missed…

Workers’ comp drug trends

myMatrixx released its annual Drug Trends Report. Key findings include:

  • 6.1% drop in drug spend for myMatrixx clients
  • 10.7% drop in opioid spend
  • over five years, clients’ opioid spend dropped 45%
  • Lyrica’s brand patent expired; within 4 weeks over 90% of patients had been switched to a less-costly generic

(myMatrixx is an HSA consulting client)

Workers’ comp pharmacy regulations – WCRI’s national inventory

Is available for purchase here. This is a must-have for any and all workers’ comp payers. Info on medical marijuana, opioid prescribing limits, drug testing, and pricing is all there.

Presumption

Pretty solid summary of presumption changes provided by the Premium Reduction blog; some good reporting on numbers of claims in FL, CO and CA as well.

Medical pricing lookup

Medata has a pretty cool medical service pricing lookup tool that’s useful for consumers, adjusters, and employers. It includes pricing for group health, auto, and workers’ comp.

COVID’s impact

Thanks to Risk & Insurance’s Courtney DuChene for her reporting on our survey of COVID”s impact on workers’ comp.

Finally, this…

And, one day, perhaps this…


Jul
20

What COVID really costs.

Last week Fair Health released an analysis of charges and payments for COVID-related medical care. Here are the key findings based on data from January through May.

  • Median estimated allowed payment for hospital care was $24,012 for people 51-60 years old
  • HOWEVER – costs varied significantly around the country, especially in the western US
  • 30% of people diagnosed with COVID19 were 51-60
  • However, the average age appears to be dropping by about 15 years
  • 54% of those diagnosed were male, 46% female
  • About 6% of diagnoses were made via telehealth
  • Patients’ past medical conditions weigh heavily on outcomes; the most common comorbidity involved kidney disease.

What does this mean for you?

  1. The median cost of hospital care for COVID patients isn’t that much.
  2. Patients with significant comorbidities will suffer more, require more treatment, and thus incur more costs.
  3. Another study found almost all patients hospitalized for COVID had comorbidities.
  4. While “only” one in 20 diagnoses were made via a telehealth visit, it is highly likely that percentage will (or already has) increase(d).
  5. Remember – this is based on data through the end of May; you can be sure things have evolved since then. For example, a best guess is 10-20% of those diagnosed with COVID end up hospitalized – but that is a guess, and does not account for undiagnosed cases (which may be several times higher than those diagnosed).

 


Jul
17

COVID Quick Hits Vol. 2

Lots of COVID news this week – here’s the latest.

The bad.

One out of every hundred Americans has been infected with COVID19.

Almost one out of every 25 people infected have died.

People of color are far worse off than white folks.

This racial disparity is pretty much everywhere, in every state, although it is particularly bad in Kansas where Black people account for 6% of the population and 22% of deaths; Michigan – 14% of the population, 41% of deaths; and Missouri – 12% and 36%.

Testing here in the US is still waaaaay behind where it should be. Results often take so long they are all but useless.

Hydroxychloroquine is useless. Or worse.

Despite being touted by the President and others who should have known better, more and more research is proving the drug:

Fortunately the FDA revoked its emergency use authorization for the drug; unfortunately idiots with no science background continue to tout it.

I have written extensively about this over the last four months; here’s

The good

We DO know masks really make a difference.

Fast, cheap, and accurate tests are coming – and they can’t get here soon enough. The paper-strip tests will cost less than $5 and give instant results. While that’s still costly, it is a lot less expensive than the current lab-based tests.

Therapeutic medications appear to be helping treat folks who are infected.

Monoclonal antibodies (taken from the blood of those already infected and maybe from mice) appear to help prevent the disease and treat those who get infected.

A study published last week shows anti-viral drug remdesivir was associated with “improved recovery and a 62 percent reduced risk for death compared with standard care.”

Black people did even better as did those not on a ventilator.

The unknown

We do NOT know if or when a vaccine will be developed and produced in sufficient quantity to inoculate enough of us.

If you’re buying into the White House’s happy talk about a vaccine, take a lesson from the Administration’s early cheerleading for hydroxychloroquine – they were completely wrong. Wait for the science, and ignore the politicians.

What does this mean for you?

Science.  It’s all about the science. 

 

 


Jul
15

Hope-driven Hype

There’s a lot of hope – in my house just as in your’s – that we will have a safe, effective and durable COVID19 vaccine in 2020.

Hope is not a strategy, nor should it guide our personal or professional behavior and planning.

Consider this.

Vaccine development

  • the record for the fastest vaccine ever brought to market was 4 years for Merck’s mumps vaccine
  • We’ve been trying unsuccessfully to get an HIV vaccine since the 1980s
  • over the last quarter-century, a total of 7 vaccines for new pathogens have been successfully developed and rolled out globally.
  • From the CEO of Merck, the world’s largest vaccine company:
    There are a lot of examples of vaccines in the past that have stimulated the immune system, but ultimately didn’t confer protection. And unfortunately, there are some cases where it stimulated the immune system and not only it didn’t confer protection, but actually helped the virus invade the cell because it was incomplete in terms of its immunogenic properties. [emphasis added]

Merck CEO Kenneth Frazier

Vaccine delivery

COVID19 is a global pandemic; many countries have no where near the healthcare infrastructure the US has, are conducting far fewer tests, and don’t have the money to pay for expensive treatment or widespread immunization. Right now, even the US is in deep trouble with almost a quarter of the world’s recorded infections and over 130,000 deaths in six months – more than twice the number of Americans that died from opioid overdoses last year…

And;

  • some vaccines require boosters or are a two-shot series;
  • some must be given every year while others convey lifetime protection;
  • some require refrigeration and special handling;
  • this will likely require hundreds of millions of bottles, caps, syringes, needles or other delivery mechanisms;
  • all must be kept sterile until use;

Let us not forget there is a substantial number of people who reject immunizations for reasons of their own.

I’ll balance this with a note that the COVID19 vaccine effort is unprecedented; there are about 160 vaccine efforts now underway. Thousands of brilliant minds are using incredibly powerful computing systems to figure this out. They are using different delivery mechanisms, trying old vaccines, experimenting with RNA-based technology, working to stimulate the immune system all in an effort to stop or blunt the impact of COVID19 infections.

It’s possible we’ll have a proven vaccine proven to be safe, effective, and durable by the end of the year. It’s also unlikely.

Whenever it arrives, make sure you are alive and well enough to be vaccinated.

What does this mean for you?

Until then, wear the mask and don’t do stupid stuff.


Jul
14

COVID’s impact on work comp – Moody’s view

Moody’s report on the impact of COVID19 on workers’ compensation says stuff I agree with, namely:

Premium dollars will drop.

Rates will drop.

Claim counts will drop.

It also says profits will be pressured and future earnings reduced, asserting presumption and issues related to furloughed workers’ claims “could lead to…rising costs for workers’ compensation insurers.”

Whoa there cowboy…not so fast.

 

Reality is insurers are still collecting billions in premiums while claim counts and claim expenses are way down – and the cost of COVID claims is minimal. Unless premium income drops dramatically and/or COVID claim costs explode, work comp insurers’ profits are going to increase – not drop.

Here’s why.

As reported in my second survey of the Impact of COVID19 on Workers’ Compensation, claim counts plummeted in the first half of 2020 – but premiums did not.

Respondents indicated workers suffering relatively minor injuries are not reporting them. This isn’t surprising, as a) past research shows this happens when employment declines, because b) workers fear reporting a claim may affect their employment.

Next, workers with existing claims can’t/won’t access needed care. Yes, this likely extends disability duration, but it also reduces medical expense. Eventually medical expense may catch up – or not as there’s evidence some foregone treatment is not “made up.”

So, fewer claims and lower costs = higher profits for insurers.

Next – premium income.

Unlike auto insurers, there are no reports of workers’ comp insurers giving back or rebating premiums. Businesses that have closed permanently aren’t paying premiums, but most are still afloat and paying their bills.

Second, there’s no indication insurers have ramped up premium audits – which would result in credits or refunds to employers due to lower payroll. Unless and until those audits are done, employers that slashed their labor costs won’t get a refund.

So, premium income is declining somewhat – but expenses have dropped more and faster. Net – higher profits for insurers today.

Moody’s also opines that low interest rates and lower reserves will “pressure profits.”

First, interest rates have dropped since COVID came to our shores, but not by much, so I don’t see that the impact will be significant.

Second, insurers are still way over-reserved – and since actuaries base future claims on past experience, and we don’t have any past experience with pandemics, I find it hard to believe insurers will decide to slash reserves.

Third – and perhaps most important, medical inflation – or, more accurately, there isn’t medical inflation – which wasn’t addressed in Moody’s analysis. There is no evidence of significant medical cost inflation in workers’ comp. Yes, facility costs are problematic in some states, especially Florida.  This has been countered by a dramatic drop in drug costs, driven in large part by much lower opioid dispensing.

The net – medical inflation is in the low single digits – likely lower than most actuarial forecasts.

So, while there may be a little pressure on future profits, it won’t amount to much.

Finally, COVID and presumption.

The industry’s reaction to presumption law changes is reminiscent of the caterwauling over medical marijuana – lots of noise about not much. Reality is:

  1. Few COVID claims incur medical expenses.
  2. COVID claims aren’t expensive – on average COVID claims with medical expenses cost less than the typical lost time claim
  3. The impact of presumption changes has been minimal.

What does this mean for you?

Workers’ comp insurer profits aren’t likely to drop much – until a price war starts.

When (not if, but when) insurers start the inevitable war over market share, profits are going to drop – a lot.

Lastly, it does the industry no credit to continue keeping premiums high when employers and governments are getting crushed. It is time for insurers to stop the “yeah, but what if…” nonsense and do the right thing. 


Jul
10

Friday funday!

Ok, it’s been another terrific week…although my definition of “terrific” has changed a lot since January.

This being Friday, it’s time to lighten things up.

Today seems like…yesterday.

Therefore, it is time to look for a present for that special friend…

Some states are going back into lockdown, which is too bad cause you’re going to miss out on stuff like this.

SPORTS!

With worries about football season, baseball scheduled to play just 60 games, and the NBA playing in a bubble, it’s time to expand our horizons and consider other sports.

Baseball may not be it for this young player…

Looks like the SEC was practicing social distancing before we knew it was a thing.

This just in from Chicago…

That “other” football has to change too.

From an Eagles fan…

Finally, as a recovering Catholic, this brought back lots of memories.