Oct
13

Revolution Health announces its management team

Revolution Health’s recent announcement of six acquisitions has been covered here in the past; now news is out regarding the management team that will lead the Revolution Health’s new company into the future. What puzzles me is the management team’s complete lack of provider, payer, or managed care experience. Heavy on internet start-up, tech, consulting, and experience “knitting together a variety of companies into cohesive operating units”, the team seems strikingly light in real world experience.
With Steve Case, Colin Powell, Jim Barksdale, Carly Fiorina, and Steve Wiggins (the only one with extensive health care experience in any sector) on the Board, one would have expected to see slightly more, or perhaps much more, real-world expertise to balance the lofty thoughts of the leadership with knowledge gained from time in the trenches.
Alas, such is not the case (no pun intended). Much attention is being paid to the consumerization of health care, with consumer-directed health plans, empowering consumers, getting consumers to take responsibility, etc. Now, the entity launched with the most fanfare looks like an amalgamation of second and third-tier companies overseen by a star-studded board and managed by folks with little experience in the actual real world of buying, delivering, or managing health care.
The CEO, John Pleasants, comes from the internet world, with extensive experience with Evite, Match.com, and CitySearch. The head of the Community Health Information division’s most recent experience is as boss of Wondir, a search engine for community health information. Don Hackett of the Information Portal Division worked with drkoop.com, and the ill-fated Physician Computer Network. The new head of research comes from Fannie Mae where she worked in the office of the Chair (who is now on the Board of RHG).
Surely the advocates of consumer-driven health care can come up with something better. Health care is an incredibly complex, multi-faceted industry that operates by a distinct set of rules and motivations, with extremely powerful and deeply entrenched stakeholders exerting control over the delivery, funding, operation, and regulation of the business.
What does this mean for you?
Likely not much.


Sep
27

Concentra’s investor briefing

Concentra Inc.’s presentation at the Bank of America Investor Conference earlier this month focused on their continued growth, focus on workers comp, and impact of the acquisitions of Beech Street and Occupational Health and Rehab.
Here are some of the highligts from the presentation and comments on same.
Revenues for 2005 are projected to be $1.1 billion, with EBITDA of $156 million and operating cash flow of $101 million. Revenues are growing organically about 5% per year, while operating cash flow is down from $114 million in 2003 to $98 in 2004 to $101 in 2005.
Workers comp is by far their largest market, driving 70% of revenues. The Beech deal will certainly help diversify Concentra’s revenue base, as Beech is a strong mid-tier group health PPO. Beech’s provider contracts will also be compared to the Concentra contracts to identify the ones with the best rates. This, coupled with the greater buying power brought by Beech, may help Concentra drive better deals with some providers.
Of Concentra’s three distinct business units, by far the highest margin business is network services, with a margin of 31%, followed by the clinic business’ 14% margin. The care management sector, which is primarily field and telephonic case management, was hurt by declining revenues and price compression and returned 6%.
Of note, the clinics saw same store revenues up 6.6% on a 5% increase in visits. This at a time when the WC injury rate has been declining by about 4%.
Thomas made the point several times that after the completion of the OH+R deal, Concentra’s clinics will see one of of every ten workers’ comp injuries for initial care. While that sounds impressive, and is impressive, it is important to note that the clinics only see the routine injuries, and most of the dollars that are spent on WC medical go to the more complex cases that are treated by specialists.
The Beech Street and OH+R acquisitions were expensive at $210 million +. The Beech deal adds significantly to Concentra’s group health product offering. while OH+R will add 26 clinics after 8 existing clinics are closed.
Both Thomas and Kiraly repeated their assertion that Concentra is the industry leader in the WC managed care business, and is a full service integrated services provider. From a sheer numbers perspective, they are correct. However, other entities are leaders in segments of the WC business. For example, Coventry’s First Health is by far the leader in the WC PPO sector. MedRisk is the industry leader in management of physical medicine; and PMSI in pharmacy management.
Thomas noted that because Concentra manages all aspects of the claim, it therefore impacts more claims dollars than other competitors. Not exactly. Intracorp has case management, networks, bill review, peer review, and access to specialty managed care. So do Genex and CorVel. Concentra’s out of network bill negotiation entity (Concentra Payment Services) may well be the industry leader in non-network bill processing, but a host of competitors are now in this space.
While Concentra is not a public company, rumors have been rampant for years of their desire to become one. That, coupled with the large amount of debt outstanding, is evidently the reason for their continued participation in these road shows.


Sep
14

Medicare physician reimbursement cuts

The latest news from Washington indicates the cut in Medicare reimbursement scheduled to go into effect on 1/1/06 may actually occur. The reduction of 4.3% is a hot topic amongst physicians, many of whom are claiming they will not continue to treat Medicare patients if the cuts go through.
Two of the key Senators on the Finance Committee (which has jurisdiction over CMS) have stated their desire to rescind the cuts. According to Congressional Quarterly, “Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said he and Senate Finance Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) are “not going to let those cuts go into effect this year”.
The fate of the proposed fee reduction will not just affect Medicare. Many group health and HMO reimbursement arrangements as well as states’ workers compensation fee schedules are based on Medicare.
Yet more evidence that when CMS gets a chill, the rest of the health care payers catch a cold.
What does this mean for you?
Keep an eye on Congress’ actions, or lack thereof, on this reduction. Regardless of the action taken or not, it will affect health care payers’ bottom lines.


Sep
1

What’s up with Case’s Revolution Health?

Not much new has come out about Revolution Health, Steve Case’s effort to bring consumerism, education, information, and innovative insurance products to the world of health care. Since the splash of the initial announcement two months ago, the silence has been noticeable, despite the inclusion of such notables as Colin Powell, Jim Barksdale, Steve Wiggins, and Frank Raines.
A front page for a website exists, although it indicates it is coming in 2004. Beyond that, nothing beyond a few brief follow ups to the initial USAToday article.
While it is somewhat of a mystery why there would be such a big splash followed by dead calm, perhaps it is due to the difficulty Case might be having in coming up with a business that actually adds real value. Because all the information to date does not describe a business that is materially different, compelling, or even very interesting.
According to an article on Revolution Health authored by the conservative Heartland Institute;
“RHG plans to acquire controlling interests in promising, innovative health care companies and build them for long-term growth.
Areas to be developed include affordable nurse-provided care at retail locations; health information to help people find a doctor or other health care provider and to learn more about medical issues and conditions; tools for managing health care finances, especially to help small and mid-sized employers help their employees; secure, easy-to-use personal health records; and innovative health coverage offering consumers new choices in how to pay for their health care.
“We will put consumers back in the center of the system by giving them more choice, control, and convenience while building the first comprehensive, consumer-driven health care company,” said Case.”
Leaving aside the obvious error – Definity Health and others have already laid claim to that hype-laden first – let’s deconstruct the business development plan.
1. Nurse provided care at retail locations – sounds like many ER departments, some occ health, company run, and local storefront clinics. Nurse care is almost always under the direction of a physician, and billing usually reflects physician charges. If Case has figured out how to have nurses work differently than they do today there may be something here. Otherwise, nothing new.
2. health information to learn more about conditions – that’s all consumers need, yet another site to go along with the 23 million websites that now offer health information. WebMD, the Centers for Disease Control, Kaiser, Aetna, Intelihealth, familydoctor.com and millions of other sources provide detailed information on everything from drug interactions to arthritis medication to cancer survival rates to new treatments for AIDS. That’s not to mention the thousands of web “businesses” based on health information that have failed over the past five years.
3. information to help consumers find a doctor or other health care provider – again, nothing new here – states are building extensive capabilities to report on hospital quality; health plans have long experience in this area; clinics, professional societies, commercial web sites, and the Yellow Pages all have a substantial head start, a customer base, and experience.
4. tools for managing health care finances for use by smaller employers – sounds like a combination of health information and insurance benefit plan design – yawn.
5. secure easy to use personal health records – Many already exist, including http://www.telemedical.com/records.html, http://www.phdtogo.com/ , your personal health record, and http://www.doctorsforpain.com/capmed.html. And some of these are free, targeted to specific patient populations, and gaining traction. For an excellent summary and more information, see http://www.myphr.com/,
6. new innovative health insurance programs – as much as I’d like to see something new and innovative, and as much press as these “consumer directed health plans” (CDHP) have generated, the reality is they are old wine in new bottles.
CDHPs are simply health insurance plans that marry old-line benefit design based on marrying high deductibles and co-pays with newer HMO delivery systems, coupled with a tax-advantaged personal health account. What’s innovative here? Not the cost-sharing, the delivery system, or the tax-advantaged account, nor the combination of all three.
At their core, CDHPs are cost-shifting from employers and other payers to the insureds. I don’t say that as a value judgment but simply state the facts. They are a reaction to employers’ frustration; after twenty years of HMOs, POS plans, capitated programs, closed and open panels, PBMs, PPOs, and the rest of the answers in the form of managed care, employers adopting these programs are throwing up their hands and saying we just can’t afford double digit increases, so employees will have to pay more.
So let’s stop all the hype and nonsense, and call them what they are. CDHPs are simply a way to get employees to pay more for their health care. And given health care trend rates, that’s not necessarily a bad thing.


Aug
24

Aetna’s quality ranking of physicians

Aetna announced they will be offering a new health plan network option in northern California and the Central Valley that ranks specialists by several cost and quality indicators. The program, which goes by the unfortunate name of Aexcel, will only include those specialists that meet the Aexcel standards, and will be offered to larger self insured employers.
According to California HealthLine,
“Aetna evaluates them on factors including:
Number of hospital readmissions within 30 days;
Adverse events;
Adherence to clinical guidelines; and
Cost of care — adjusted for the severity of a patient’s illness — relative to the geographic area.
The health plan considers Aexcel specialists to be the top-performing in an area with regard to cost and quality. Employers can include Aexcel in Aetna’s non-HMO health plans, either as an option or a requirement.”
Kudos to Aetna for their courage – physicians who do not meet their criteria will undoubtedly protest, and some may have valid points. But the key is to start somewhere, and this is a great start. The best physicians deserve more business, and docs who underperform deserve less.
What does this mean for you?
More incentive to differentiate your health plan, or select a health plan, based not on a spreadsheet but on the value they deliver, defined as the plan’s ability to help you improve outcomes and costs.


Aug
3

Concentra to acquire Beech Street

Concentra will acquire Beech Street for $165 million. The announcement indicates that the deal will be finalized this year, and a definitive agreement has been signed by both parties.
Beech’s senior management, led by Bill Hale, will be continuing in their roles, according to the companies’ joint press release. Concentra CEO Dan Thomas noted that Beech’s strong group health PPO will add strength to Concentra’s group business. While Concentra has been active in smaller niches in the group business, it has long been a relatively minor market for the company.
There will be the usual Federal approval processes, which should not be much of an issue. Concentra and Beech have been contractually linked for some time with Beech providing network access to its provider network under Concentra’s Focus PPO.
My take – a smart move by Concentra to gain share and presence in the group market, diversifying its revenue sources and adding depth in provider networks, at a very reasonable price.
What does this mean for you?
More consolidation means more bargaining power for the networks with providers and payers alike.


Jul
13

UHG-Pacificare deal – why?

Roy Poses has some interesting insights into the financial benefits and costs of the pending Pacificare-UnitedHealth merger in his blog Health Care Renewal. Dr Poses notes that two of the execs involved both make over a hundred million this year or will make it if this deal gets done.
He also highlights Dr. Alain Enthoven’s views on the deal, citing his credentials as a:
“charter member of the Jackson Hole group, and long-time advocate of managed competition… “I don’t see this as beneficial to California consumers or employers…I regard this as a loss and doubt there are any economies of scale to be achieved here.”
The LA Times quotes UHG CEO Bill McGuire on the business justification for the deal; “”There is not enough money


Jul
7

United acquiring Pacificare

It’s official, United HealthGroup intends to acquire Pacificare, increasing their membership to 25.7 million and tripling their Medicare insured business. This will also strengthen UHG’s west coast operations, long a sore spot for the company.
With the announcement came protests from consumer advocacy groups and others in California. These groups were instrumental in delaying the Anthem-Wellpoint deal, which passed after the companies agreed to allocate over $300 million to fund health care for low income citizens. Expect these groups to weigh in aggressively on this deal as well.
That said, UHG is more expert in acquisitions than the Anthem management was at the time of the Wellpoint deal, and are undoubtedly even smarter now. They will likely move things along more expeditiously than some would expect.
If the deal does go thru, UHG will be a close second to Anthem’s membership of 27.7 million. Ratings agency Fitch likes the UHG – Pacificare deal, noting
“Fitch views the transaction as strategically beneficial to UnitedHealth. Approximately 1.8 million, or 57% of Pacificare’s 3.2 million members are located in California, which is a state where UnitedHealth has historically lacked a competitive market share. Pacificare’s provider network within the State of California will be of significant value to UnitedHealth, which currently gains use of a provider network through a network access agreement with Blue Shield of California. In addition, UnitedHealth will be acquiring the largest player in the Medicare Advantage program.”
Frequent readers will note I have ong been talking about constraints on growth for these big managed care plans. There options are to acquire, grow organically, or diversify. While the price seems steep, it is better than cutting rates to gain market share or getting into another line of insurance about which they know little.
Expect there to be renewed interest in plans such as Cigna and Coventry.
This deal reduces UHG’s expenses (it will no longer have to “rent” BC CA’s networks), adds expertise in pharmacy management and Medicare, strengthens its networks nationally, and adds significant depth to their national accounts efforts. A tough competitor just got tougher.
What does this mean for you?
If you are a provider, there will be increasingn pressure in CA as the number of “suppliers” dwindles. Oligopolies have some benefits, but rarely do they spur innovation and intense competition the likes of which have driven the insurance industry over the last two decades.


Jun
29

Aetna’s HMS purchase

In yet another sign that the group health world is consolidating, Aetna has purchased PPOM, the dominant non-Blues network in Michigan, along with parent company HMS Health. PPOM looks to be the prize of the deal, as it adds a very strong network to Aetna’s offerings, while removing PPOM from the target list of Anthem, United, et al.
PPOM has 11% market share (defined as 11% of ALL state residents) in Michigan covered by its more than 27 thousand providers in the state. The network also has about 30,000 additional providers contracted in other Midwestern states.
For Aetna, with a paltry 262,000 insureds in Michigan out of its total population of 14 million, the acquisition opens up a significant market where it was previously virtually unable to compete. The acquisition also strengthens the Hartford, CT-based insurer in Colorado, as it includes the Sloans Lake and Mountain Medical networks.
The usual post-deal press releases indicate the new Aetna companies will continue to operate under their present names, staff will not be affected, etc. Perhaps true over the short term, but highly unlikely over the long. This industry is just too competitive to forgo any expense reduction opportunities.
Notably, two of Aetna’s competitors, Humana and MCare, also access PPOM. Although Aetna has said they will continue to provide access to the networks in Michigan to these other entities, one has to wonder how long that will last. Perhaps when Aetna’s membership grows enough to justify losing the other payers’ access fee revenue…
For work comp payers, PPOM is almost the only game in town in Michigan. With Aetna’s workers comp network still struggling to gain traction, one can see a strong push by management to non-renew other WC PPO contracts in an effort to grow the Aetna WC business.
What does this mean for you?
Hold on to your smaller PPO and HMO stock holdings. Someone is bound to come knocking soon. If you are a mid-tier player, sell while you still have some membership left.


Jun
16

California HMO costs

CalPERS has managed to hold HMO rate increases for 2006 to 8.7%, while PPO increases are up 9.5%. CalPERS is widely recognized as one of, if not the most, effective negotiators with managed care plans, so their achievement will set the standard for other employers/unions/etc as they begin their negotiations with their health plans. According to their website,
California Public Employees’ Retirement System … provides retirement and health benefits to more than 1.4 million public employees, retirees, and their families and more than 2,500 employers…”
The 8.7% is the lowest increase since 1999; with 2005 rates up 10%, 2004 16.4%, and 2003 a mind-numbing 24.1%. Of particular note is that benefit design was essentially unchanged as were copayments and prescription drug coverage.
When health plan rate increases negotiated by a very savvy, and very large, payer are more than three times the overall rate of inflation, and when that is trumpeted as good news, you know we are in trouble.
What does this mean for you?
Hold on to your wallet – if you can keep your rate increase below 11% without significant damage to your benefit design, congratulations.